The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research

By N. Theunissen, T. Vogels, H. Koopman, G. Verrips, K. Zwinderman, S. Verloove-vanhorick, J. Wit. Quality of Life Research, 2004

720 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8a757cd3cc555497e3998f0b65a0ae5d605dc59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. C. Eiser
2. Curt Hagquist

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

1. C. Eiser
2. A. Ben-Arieh

Citations in the corpus

• Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life (2010, result): “Previous studies found adolescents self-reports less positive about their health than parents reports [ 32 ].”
• Validity and Reliability of a Questionnaire for Measuring Child Oral-health-related Quality of Life (2002, background): “While parents are useful as informants, their reports are now regarded as complementary to and not substitutes for child reports (Guyatt et al., 1997; Theunissen et al., 1998; Parsons et al., 1999; Le Coq et al., 2000).”
• Can parents rate their child's health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review (2004, background): “Questionnaires may be completed while children and parents are waiting for clinic appointments [17, 22] or sent by post [17, 25, 26].”