Experiencing the Restorative Components of Wilderness Environments: Does Congestion Interfere and Does Length of Exposure Matter?
By D. Cole, Troy E. Hall. 2010
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8a70a1241ee561913611237d42897ac6199c7b1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Katherine Arbuthnott
- C. Neill
- J. Gerard
- Ethan A. McMahan
- D. Estes
- A. Omoto
- Matthew T. Ballew
- Holli-Anne Passmore
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Nature contact and mood benefits: contact duration and mood type (2018, background): “The evidence that does exist about duration and frequency is primarily correlational and suggests that increased contact with nature improves well-being benefits (Carrus et al., 2015; Cole & Hall, 2010; Kelevi, Matti, Liisa, & Harri, 2008; Lafortezza, Carrus, Sanesi, & Davies, 2009).”
- The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis (2015, background): “…studies compared the effects of exposure to natural environments to exposure to urban or built environments.2 Studies which did not utilize a randomized control group design, such as those that used a single-group posttest-only design (e.g. Cole & Hall, 2010), were excluded from the review.”