Intergenerational Ambivalence: Further Steps in Theory and Research

By K. Lüscher. 2002

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8a63058c868162e7a8083aa36fcabdf20bc41dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Tatek Abebe
2. K. Fingerman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Tatek Abebe
2. Kira S Birditt
3. K. Fingerman

Citations in the corpus

• The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships (2004, background): “A burgeoning literature has brought intergenerational ambivalence to the fore of family science (e.g., Connidis & McMullin, 2002b; Lüscher, 2002; Lüscher & Pillemer, 1998; Pillemer & Suitor, 2002; Willson, Shuey, & Elder, 2003).”
• Reconceptualising Children’s Agency as Continuum and Interdependence (2019, background): “An intergenerational approach engages with how “social structure produces agency, and vice versa, acting as a bridging concept between social structure and individual action, made evident in social interaction” (Luscher 2002, p. 587).”