Integrating individual habitat choices and regional distribution of a biodiversity indicator and top predator

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Identifying suitable habitat for dispersal in Bonelli’s eagle: An important issue in halting its decline in Europe (2005, unknown): “All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.023 1993; Ferrer and Harte, 1997; Penteriani et al., 2001; Suárez et al., 2000; Seoane et al., 2003; Fernández et al., 2003; Sergio et al., 2003, 2004).”
Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation (2006, background): “Fifthly, predators often select sites with high topographic and habitat complexity (Sergio, Marchesi & Pedrini 2004a; Sergio et al. 2004b, 2005 and references therein), which also often promotes high biodiversity (Rosenzweig 1995; Gaston 1996).”
GIS-models work well, but are not enough: Habitat preferences of Lanius collurio at multiple levels and conservation implications (2009, methodology): “…distribution through a bottom-up procedure, as the one proposed by Sergio et al. (2004), which is based on the traditional biogeography theory that geographical distribution of a species results from the collective outcome of the adaptive habitat choices of individuals (Sergio et al., 2004).”