Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs
By J. Spangenberg. 2017
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c873400e6776357457b23dbc0d69bfbaace2d85d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Sustainable Development Goals and the Forest Sector—a Complex Relationship (2019, background): “Targets for pressures are missing; targets referring to driving forces are mentioned (like sustained growth or free trade and globalization) in the sense of “more of the same”, instead of reversing these driving forces, which led to the current state of unsustainability [11].”
- About the Triggering of UN Sustainable Development Goals and Regenerative Sustainability in Higher Education (2019, background): “As Spangenberg [90] warns, the SDGs can be seen re found to be weak on ‘agency’, since public administrations have limited duties on reporting and achievements, while business or consumers almost none (which is why success of SDGs is seen to be through the private, not public sector).”