The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population
By J. Elliot, S. Kern, K. B. Clancy, A. Gulbis, R. Millis, M. Buie, L. Wasserman, E. Chiang, A. B. Jordan, D. Trilling and 1 more. 2005
236 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c86c78feeb58ecf2ea2d596ebcbb343bcd492467
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- D. Schneider
- A. Morbidelli
- D. Nesvorný
- P. Hopkins
- L. Hernquist
- J. Brinkmann
- Simon D. M. White
- M. Strauss
Citations in the corpus
- Origin of the structure of the Kuiper belt during a dynamical instability in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune (2007, background): “Given that the observational biases are roughly a function of q, the apparent relative under-density of objects at low eccentricity in the region immediately interior to Neptune’s 1:2 MMR is likely to be a real feature of the Kuiper belt distribution. iv) The outer edge of the classical belt (Fig.”
- THE CANADA–FRANCE ECLIPTIC PLANE SURVEY—L3 DATA RELEASE: THE ORBITAL STRUCTURE OF THE KUIPER BELT (2009, methodology): “While those slopes are consistent with274 Elliot et al. (2005) they are shallower than Bernstein et al. (2004) and our own estimates.”
- LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2008, background): “…function of color and size; the search for dynamical families (Marcus et al. 2011); studies of shapes and structure using light curves (Duncan & Levison 1995; Trujillo, Jewitt & Luu 2001; Gladman et al. 2001; Bernstein et al. 2004; Elliot et al. 2005; Jones et al. 2006; Doressoundiram et al. 2007).”
- Neptune’s Migration into a Stirred-Up Kuiper Belt: A Detailed Comparison of Simulations to Observations (2005, result): “The shallow size distribution that is inferred here for the 3:2 population is also consistent with the logarithmic slope of α ≃ 0.56 that Elliot et al. (2005) recently reported for the luminosity function of their ‘resonant’ population that is dominated by 3:2 KBOs; the size distribution inferred…”