Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use

By J. Virgona, F. A. J. Gummer, J. Angus. 2006

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c869d805cd709c15ce9e70c0c55a4cd9e5376da4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

1. R. Richards
2. G. Rebetzke
3. M. Watt
4. J. Kirkegaard
5. G. Howe
6. Jonathan M. Graham
7. J. Lilley
8. James R. Hunt

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Kirkegaard
2. James R. Hunt
3. Jonathan M. Graham
4. J. Lilley
5. Lindsay W. Bell
6. G. Rebetzke

Citations in the corpus

• A preliminary whole-farm economic analysis of perennial wheat in an Australian dryland farming system (2008, background): “We assumed that there was no effect of early season grazing (prior to 13 June) on grain production, and later grazing was not allowed to reduce any detrimental impact on grain yield (Winter and Thompson, 1987; Virgona et al., 2006).”
• Physiological traits and cereal germplasm for sustainable agricultural systems (2007, background): “greater (Virgona et al., 2006) and waterlogging reduced (Gardner and Flood, 1993).”
• Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield (2007, background): “2005), or grazing management of dual-purpose wheat (Virgona et al. 2006), which can all potentially defer water use from early in the season to later in the season to capitalise on the higher water-use efficiency achieved at that stage.”
• Optimising grain yield and grazing potential of crops across Australia’s high-rainfall zone: a simulation analysis. 1. Wheat (2015, methodology): “There is limited confidence in the ability of APSIM’s current wheat model to simulate regrowth following defoliation, so these simulation ruleswere chosen to be consistent with grazing management shown repeatedly to have negligible impact on yield recovery (Virgona et al. 2006; Kelman and Dove 2009;”
• Dual-purpose cereals: Can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected? (2011, unknown): “1994) to small delays (1–2 days, Swanson 1935; Winter and Thompson 1990) to long delays (10–11 days, Nicholson 2006; Virgona et al. 2006).”