Terrorist Decision Making

By Gordon H. McCormick. 2003

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c861f68abb51fd01c4fe156f8becfa2fa555e8ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nick Bostrom
2. J. Monahan
3. Robert Klemmensen
4. Milan M. Cirkovic
5. Max Abrahms
6. M. Justesen

Citations in the corpus

• The Political Effectiveness of Terrorism Revisited (2012, background): “terrorism, coercion, civilian targeting, political psychology It is widely believed that terrorists attack civilians to coerce their governments into granting concessions (e.g., Crenshaw, 1990; DeNardo, 1985; McCormick, 2003).”
• Global Catastrophic Risks (2008, methodology): “Also, compare for example, Falkenrath et al. (1998, pp. 206–207) and McCormick (2003).”
• The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism (2006, background): “3 Cf. McCormick, who defines it as “the deliberate use of symbolic violence or the threat of violence against non-combatants for political purposes.” ( McCormick, 2003: 474).”
• The Individual Risk Assessment of Terrorism (2012, methodology): “Approaches to risk assessment that structure three components of the process—the identification, measurement, and combination of risk factors—are illustrated by the Classification of Violence Risk (COVR) actuarial software (Monahan et al, 2005), mentioned in the DoD report Protecting the Force (2010”