The combining classifier: to train or not to train?
By Robert P. W. Duin. Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots, 2002
412 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8518c1bae658ff2d4fb8ba41e307a681c1559f7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Yoshua Bengio
- Quoc V. Le
- R. Caruana
- Geoffrey E. Hinton
- Andrew Zisserman
- Jonathan Masci
- Mohit Bansal
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Luc Van Gool
- Xiaogang Wang
- Dacheng Tao
- Trevor Darrell
- Andrew Zisserman
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Andrea Vedaldi
Citations in the corpus
- An Off-line Signature Verification System Based on Fusion of Local and Global Information (2004, background): “Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages as discussed in [25].”
- Getting the Most Out of Ensemble Selection (2006, result): “Counter to our and others’ intuition [5], calibrating models to put all predictions on the same scale before averaging them did not improve ensemble selection’s effectiveness.”
- Multi-column deep neural network for traffic sign classification (2012, background): “A key question is whether to optimize the combination of outputs of various models or not (Duin, 2002).”
- A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems (2014, background): “little practical applicability because of the hard conditions imposed by them [145].”
- Cost-sensitive decision tree ensembles for effective imbalanced classification (2014, positive): “While simple aggregation methods (like minimum, maximum, product, mean) can be used, they are typically subject to rather restrictive conditions [12] which limit their practical use.”