Stability and comparison of different linear tetrahedral formulations for nearly incompressible explicit dynamic applications

78 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Finite calculus formulation for incompressible solids using linear triangles and tetrahedra (2004, methodology): “Other methods to overcome volumetric locking are based on mixed displacement (or velocity)–pressure formulations using the Galerkin-least-square (GLS) method [12], average nodal pressure [13] and average nodal deformation [14] techniques and sub-grid scale (SGS) methods [15–18].”
Mixed linear/linear simplicial elements for incompressible elasticity and plasticity (2003, background): “Therefore, this is today a very active area for research in solid mechanics [7–16].”
Softening, localization and stabilization: capture of discontinuous solutions in J2 plasticity (2004, background): “This is another very attractive area of on-going research, see References [11–20] among others.”
Formulation of a dynamic material point method (MPM) for geomechanical problems (2013, result): “[31] compare two approaches to mitigate mesh locking, both taking advantage of explicit time-stepping algorithms: average nodal pressure (ANP) formulation versus fractional step or velocity correction procedure.”