Bowling Alone: a review essay
By Steven N. Durlauf. 2002
174 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8470c39635ff0adb40cd7fa6a1bb0f49aa5f63c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Stephan J. Goetz
- Anil Rupasingha
- Sjoerd Beugelsdijk
- T. van Schaik
- Philip E. Keefer
- Stephen F. Knack
- Maria Minniti
- Stephan Heblich
Citations in the corpus
- Social capital and growth in European regions : An empirical test (2005, background): “(1992), growth empirics has turned to the role of institutions and culture (Temple, 1999; Temple and Johnson, 1998), presently crystallizing around the concept of social capital (see, e.g., Durlauf, 2002a for an introduction to a symposium on social capital in The Economic Journal).”
- A Note on the Theory and Measurement of Trust in Explaining Differences in Economic Growth (2006, background): “However, both theoretically and empirically, these studies exhibit a number of problems (Jackman and Miller, 1996; Fedderke et al. 1999; Manski, 2000; Paldam and Svendsen, 2000; Boggs, 2001; Fine, 2001; Durlauf, 2002A, 2002B; Sobel, 2002; Beugelsdijk et al., 2004).”
- On the Empirics of Social Capital (2002, unknown): “Durlauf (2002c) verifies the following proposition, which describes necessary conditions for identification.”
- Social capital access and entrepreneurship (2010, background): “However, due to data restrictions and since there is no clear theory on the determinants of social capital formation, the problem cannot be completely resolved in this way in practice (Durlauf, 2002a,b).”
- Social Capital, Social Norms and the New Institutional Economics (2005, background): “Durlauf (2002) and Portes (1998) criticize the use of vague and inconsistent definitions of social capital in the literature; Sobel (2002) agrees but argues that “a vague keyword is not sufficient reason to condemn a promising line of research.” specifically the two prisoner’s dilemma variants with…”
- Entrepreneurship and network externalities (2005, background): “As a result, some researchers have been critical of the literature since the variety of meanings attributed to the term prevents a rigorous use of the notion (Durlauf, 2002; Woolcock, 2001).”
- The production of social capital in US counties (2006, background): “While Putnam and others (Paxton, 1999) have extensively studied change in social capital over time, they provide little insight as to why cross-sectional variations exist in social capital ( Durlauf, 2002 ).”
- Differences in social capital between 54 Western European regions (2005, background): “Second, into account in future research (D 2002b;the 1950 figures on regional GDP are provided in an D and F , 2004).”