Reversible integer-to-integer wavelet transforms for image compression: performance evaluation and analysis

By M. Adams, F. Kossentini. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2000

428 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c837085109f0ad87a66e28467a3f0be73699fb52

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Touradj Ebrahimi
2. David S. Taubman
3. Majid Rabbani
4. Athanassios N. Skodras
5. Rajan L. Joshi
6. Charilaos A. Christopoulos
7. Vivek K Goyal
8. A. Bovik

In Signal Processing

1. Majid Rabbani
2. Touradj Ebrahimi
3. David S. Taubman
4. Michael W. Marcellin
5. Athanassios N. Skodras
6. Rajan L. Joshi
7. Charilaos A. Christopoulos
8. Oren Rippel

Citations in the corpus

• The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard (2001, methodology): “The default reversible transformation is implemented by means of the Le Gall 5-tap/3-tap filter, the coefficients of which are given in Table 4 [2], [12], [46].”
• An overview of the JPEG 2000 still image compression standard (2002, methodology): “An important advantage of the lifting approach is that it can provide a convenient framework for constructing integer-to-integer DWT filters from any general filter specification [1,10].”
• JPEG2000: standard for interactive imaging (2002, background): “Specifically, JPEG2000 defines “reversible” transforms in which the output of each lifting filter is rounded to an integer [28], [29].”