Spectrum Sensing Measurements of Pilot, Energy, and Collaborative Detection
By D. Cabric, A. Tkachenko, Robert W. Brodersen. IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2006
677 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c830dbfd46992759cee27a9e7dfda0c6f682ebb3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- CRAHNs: Cognitive radio ad hoc networks (2009, neutral): “For more practical implementation, a pilot signal of PU systems is used for the matched filter detection in [7].”
- Multi-antenna based spectrum sensing for cognitive radios: A GLRT approach (2010, background): “, energy detection [1], [2], matched-filter detection [3]-[5], and cyclostationaritybased detection [6], [7].”
- Multiantenna-Assisted Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio (2010, methodology): “Generally, spectrum-sensing methods include matched filter detection [8]–[11], energy detection [12]–[15], and cyclostationary feature detection [16]–[18].”
- Maximum Eigenvalue Detection: Theory and Application (2008, methodology): “MF-based methods require perfect knowledge of the channel responses from the primary user to the receiver and accurate synchronization (otherwise its performance will be reduced dramatically) [13], [9].”
- A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications (2009, methodology): “Measurement results presented in [25] show”
- Advances in cognitive radio networks: A survey (2011, background): “Moreover, coherent detection outperforms energy detection in the sensing convergence time [51], [52], because the sensing time of energy detection increases quadratically with the SNR reduction, while that of coherent detection only increases linearly [52].”