Reply to ``Comment on `Insulating Behavior of $\lambda$-DNA on the Micron Scale' "
By Yaojun Zhang, R. H. Austin, E. C. Cox, N. Ong. 2004
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In our experiment, we found that the resistance of vacuum-dried $\lambda$-DNA exceeds $10^{14} \Omega$ at 295 K. Bechhoefer and Sen have raised a number of objections to our conclusion. We provide counter arguments to support our original conclusion.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c82c526c85ffc69af9983f83432f4fadac82f0e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Citations in the corpus
- Colloquium: The quest for high-conductance DNA (2004, background): “…outcomes are amazingly different, covering all possible results: insulating (Braun et al., 1998; de Pablo et al., 2000; Storm et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2002), semiconducting (Porath et al., 2000), Ohmic (Fink and Schönenberger, 1999; Cai et al., 2000; Tran et al., 2000; Rakitin et al.,…”
- Charge transport in DNA-based devices (2004, background): “Both results [ 36 , 65] were consistent with the de Pablo et al. experiment [64].”