Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force.

By G. Guyatt, D. Gutterman, M. Baumann, Doreen Addrizzo-Harris, E. Hylek, B. Phillips, G. Raskob, S. Lewis, Holger J. Schünemann. Chest, 2006

1,269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c82756b60f983b8626b0d53a7a43b94b269791b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Elie A. Akl

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

1. M. Jorge Cardoso
2. C. Hudis

In Statistics and Probability

1. T. Coats
2. Elie A. Akl
3. David F. Tolin
4. Dean McKay
5. P. Marik

Citations in the corpus

• Empirically Supported Treatment: Recommendations for a New Model (2015, methodology): “…appraisal of the evidence, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system (Atkins et al., 2004; Guyatt et al., 2006, 2008) to assess the quality of relevant evidence and degree to which benefits are established in excess of potential harms.”
• The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition (2019, methodology): “The recommendations made in this guideline are graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system [44], summarised in Table 1.”
• Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations (2006, methodology): “To simplify the clinical application of these guidelines the WSACS has adopted a modification of the approach developed by the international GRADE group [35, 36].”
• Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline (2013, methodology): “Table 1 Grading of recommendations after [24] (reprinted with permission)”
• Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice—Evidence‐Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Sixth Special Issue (2013, methodology): “recommendations derived from Guyatt and coworkers [8].”
• Serrated Lesions of the Colorectum: Review and Recommendations From an Expert Panel (2012, background): “The recommendations presented here generally and necessarily reflect expert consensus opinion, as the levels of evidence available to support recommendations are of low or very low quality (20).”