Simulating Competition and Coexistence between Plant Functional Types in a Dynamic Vegetation Model
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c81f5c4618c91e758cdb49d659249f5438f30ff4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Next-generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology. (2013, methodology): “This approach has been adopted, for instance, by TRIFFID (Cox, 2001) and CTEM (Arora & Boer, 2006).”
- Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities (2018, unknown): “We adopt this terminology since both individual and cohort models present similar opportunities and challenges as they are implemented within ESMs.”
- Perspectives on the Future of Land Surface Models and the Challenges of Representing Complex Terrestrial Systems (2020, background): “…types (Bonan, 1996; D. M. Lawrence et al., 2011; Zeng et al., 2002), through mean individual dynamic models with simple rules governing competition (Arora & Boer, 2006; Cox, 2001; Sitch et al., 2003), to models that resolve physiological processes at the canopy level and implicitly downscale to…”