Measurement theory and practice

By Rajender Aparasu. 2010

Subfields: Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

1. José Hernandez-Orallo
2. Hanna M. Wallach
3. Samuel D. Gosling
4. Abigail Z. Jacobs

Citations in the corpus

• Measurement and Fairness (2019, background): “Measurements of constructs like height are sometimes called representational measurements, which are derived by “representing physical objects and their relationships by numbers” [30]—for example, using a ruler to represent a unit of height.”
• Evaluation in artificial intelligence: from task-oriented to ability-oriented measurement (2017, background): “This is partially because we do not see AI evaluation as a measurement process (Hand, 2004).”
• Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data. (2016, background): “The BFI data ( N = 3,093,144) were obtained via noncommercial, advertisement-free Internet websites between 1999 and 2013 as part of the Gosling-Potter Internet Personality Project (e.g., Bleidorn et al., 2013; Gosling, Vazire, Srivastava, & John, 2004; Obschonka, Schmitt-Rodermund, Silbereisen, Gos”