Implicit boundary method for finite element analysis using non‐conforming mesh or grid
By Ashok V. Kumar, Sanjeev Padmanabhan, Ravi Burla. 2008
69 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c811ea7ebea30cb25338573018a4a64ec09348d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- M. Cortis
- Y. Bing
- A. Brennan
- S. Robinson
- Michael Brown
- Ashok V. Kumar
- William M. Coombs
- T. J. Charlton
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
- M. Cortis
- Y. Bing
- A. Brennan
- S. Robinson
- Michael Brown
- Ashok V. Kumar
- William M. Coombs
- T. J. Charlton
Citations in the corpus
- B-spline based boundary conditions in the material point method (2019, background): “Examples of suitable D-functions can be found in [33,40,41].”
- Topology optimization using B-spline finite elements (2011, methodology): “In the Implicit Boundary Finite Element Method (IBFEM) ( Kumar et al. 2008 ; B urla and Kumar 2008), a structured mesh, which has uniform, regular shaped elements, is used for the analysis and special solution structures are constructed to impose boundary conditions.”
- Imposition of essential boundary conditions in the material point method (2018, background): “Equations 26, 27, and 28 are valid for both curved and straight boundaries, and the inner integrals in 26 and 27 are evaluated in the same way in both cases.”