EXTENDING SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY: MODELING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COHESION, DISORDER, AND FEAR*
By Fred E. Markowitz, Paul E. Bellair, A. Liska, Jianhong Liu. 2001
522 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7eb3ee6cdf8b956493d06d016384a06d7ab9e83
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- John R. Hipp
- Eric P. Baumer
- Michael Hanslmaier
- Wouter Steenbeek
- Nicole E. Rader
- S. Messner
- R. Rosenfeld
- B. Lawton
Citations in the corpus
- LIES, DAMN LIES, AND RUMORS: AN ANALYSIS OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY, RUMORS, AND FEAR IN THE WAKE OF KATRINA (2007, background): “…physical and social incivilities (Lewis and Maxfield 1980; LaGrange et al. 1992; Jackson 2004), socioeconomic status (Markowitz, Bellair, Liska, and Liu 2001), prior victimization (Kanan and Pruitt 2002), and collective efficacy (Gibson et al. 2002; Lee and Earnest 2003; Markowitz et al. 2001).”
- Fear of crime and vulnerability: Using a national sample of Americans to examine two competing paradigms (2012, background): “In addition, communities with increased levels of incivilities and disorder may cause members of those communities to feel more vulnerable to victimization and can lead to increased fear (Markowitz et al., 2001; Wyant, 2008).”
- Modeling Micro-Level Crime Location Choice: Application of the Discrete Choice Framework to Crime at Places (2010, unknown): “characteristics of residential units and residents (e.g., Markowitz et al. 2001; Wilcox et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2007).”
- Specifying the Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Robust Assessment in 24 Metropolitan Areas (2009, methodology): “…households, and economic resources of the neighborhood affect the formation of social ties, which in turn, allow a neighborhood to provide the sort of social control necessary to address crime and disorder when it appears (Hipp 2007b, Markowitz et al. 2001, Sampson & Groves 1989, Warner 2003).”
- A LONGITUDINAL TEST OF SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY: FEEDBACK EFFECTS AMONG COHESION, SOCIAL CONTROL, AND DISORDER* (2011, methodology): “Only a few papers, namely Sampson and Raudenbush (1999), Bellair (2000), Markowitz et al. (2001), and Robinson et al. (2003) explicitly modeled reciprocal relationships between crime and its social conditions. However, in these studies the number of time points is still very limited with just one ti”
- A Dynamic View of Neighborhoods: The Reciprocal Relationship between Crime and Neighborhood Structural Characteristics (2010, background): “…and informal social control (a mechanism of social disorganization) implicitly assume that individuals only respond to crime through the amount of informal social control they provide and not through residential mobility outcomes (Bellair 2000; Markowitz et al. 2001; Sampson and Raudenbush 1999).”
- DO NEIGHBORHOODS GENERATE FEAR OF CRIME? AN EMPIRICAL TEST USING THE BRITISH CRIME SURVEY* (2011, background): “The notion that visual signs of neighborhood disorder exert a direct influence on fear of crime has a good deal of prima facie empirical support (Markowitz et al., 2001; Robinson et al., 2003; Taylor, 2001; Wyant, 2008).”
- Neighborhood Residents' Production of Order: The Effects of Collective Efficacy on Responses to Neighborhood Problems (2006, background): “Residential stability is also considered an important determinant of social control (Bellair, 2000; Kasarda & Janowitz, 1974; Markowitz et al., 2001; Sampson, 1988; Sampson et al., 1997).”
- The Impact of Citizen Perceptions of Community Policing on Fear of Crime: Findings from Twelve Cities (2003, background): “CONCLUSION An unreasonably high level of fear of crime concerns both police and residents because it reduces quality of life and neighborhood cohesion and in doing so can increase crime (Markowitz et al., 2001).”
- Multilevel Longitudinal Impacts of Incivilities: Fear of Crime, Expected Safety, and Block Satisfaction (2003, background): “Although this is what the theory has specified, nonrecursive relationships seem plausible as well (see also Bursik, 1988 for comments on nonrecursive social disorganization-fear of crime links; see also Markowitz et al., 2001).”
- Crime, fear and subjective well-being: How victimization and street crime affect fear and life satisfaction (2013, background): “This in turn increases social disorganization (Kubrin and Weitzer, 2003: 390; Liska and Warner, 1991; Markowitz et al., 2001; Skogan, 1986).”
- "Seeing" Minorities And Perceptions Of Disorder: Explicating The Mediating And Moderating Mechanisms Of Social Cohesion (2013, background): “…in neighborhoods characterized by concentrated disadvantage and residential instability (Skogan, 1990; Steenbeek and Hipp, 2011; Taylor, 1995) and lower in areas where residents share common values and work together to solve local problems (Markowitz et al., 2001; Sampson and Raudenbush, 1999).”
- Modeling Fear of Crime in Dallas Neighborhoods (2007, unknown): “Prior research testing social disorganization theory also suggests that increased neighborhood disorder reduces community cohesion (Markowitz et al., 2001).”