Configural coding of facial expressions: The impact of inversion and photographic negative

By Andrew J. Calder, J. Jansen. 2005

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7e1e56da965813ca4b8c84f581f47efc653eaa8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. M. Coleman
2. A. Bailey
3. S. Wallace

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. M. Coleman
2. A. Bailey
3. S. Wallace

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Coleman
2. A. Bailey
3. S. Wallace

Citations in the corpus

• An investigation of basic facial expression recognition in autism spectrum disorders (2008, background): “The importance of configural processing to the successful recognition of facial expressions has been highlighted in a number of previous studies (Calder, Young, Keane, & Dean, 2000; Calder & Jansen, 2005; Ekman & Friesen, 1976; McKelvie, 1995).”
• The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing (2007, unknown): “A similar pattern of better performance on aligned than misaligned different trials has been found when adults were asked to recognize the expression in the top half of composite faces (Calder & Jansen, 2005, Exp. 3).”