Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: some research questions
By G. Coyle. 2000
385 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7b4498f0d097cbf2feaca3d79970c4208611176
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Luis Felipe Luna-Reyes
- Deborah L. Andersen
- Anthony J. Jakeman
- Mark E. Borsuk
- Alexey A. Voinov
- Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette
- Michel E. Etienne
- Martin F. G. Schaffernicht
Citations in the corpus
- Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models (2003, background): “In some cases, the uncertainty associated with the quantification of qualitative variables has caused experts to believe that the results from ensuing simulations could be misleading , or at least, very fragile (Coyle 2000).”
- Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies † (2002, background): “Several authors feel that the choice for qualitative versus quantitative models depends on problem characteristics such as scope, tangibility, data availability and conflict between stakeholders (Akkermans 1995; Coyle 2000).”
- Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management (2013, background): “Each parameter needs to have a real world counterpart (Sterman, 2000), and should be tested for the values for which the model remains valid (Coyle, 2000).”