When competition merges people's behavior: Interdependency activates shared action representations

By K. Ruys, Henk Aarts. 2010

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7b1adc596811fa6e04dcaeaed0d4b0ef7a8e14a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Natalie Sebanz
2. Günther Knoblich
3. Stephen A. Butterfill
4. Wolfgang Prinz
5. A. Holländer
6. Roman Liepelt
7. Pamela Baess
8. Dorit Wenke

In Social Psychology

1. Günther Knoblich
2. Natalie Sebanz
3. Stephen A. Butterfill
4. Wolfgang Prinz
5. A. Holländer
6. Roman Liepelt
7. Pamela Baess
8. Dorit Wenke

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Stephen A. Butterfill
2. Günther Knoblich
3. Natalie Sebanz

Citations in the corpus

• Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data (2011, background): “…be visible (Welsh, Higgins, et al., 2007) and of a biological nature (Tsai & Brass, 2007), whereas other findings suggest that shared task representations occur even when people merely believe that they are acting together with another person (Ruys & Aarts, 2010; Tsai, Kuo, Hung, & Tzeng, 2008).”
• What is Shared in Joint Action? Issues of Co-representation, Response Conflict, and Agent Identification (2011, background): “…the visibility of the other's actions (Sebanz et al. 2003), the absence vs. presence of the co-actor in the same room (Tsai et al. 2008; Welsh et al. 2007), cooperative vs. competitive setting (Ruys and Aarts 2010), and the quality of the relationship with the co-actor (Hommel et al. 2009).”