Can you feel the rhythm? A short questionnaire to describe two dimensions of chronotype
By H. Oginska. 2011
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract The article presents the short questionnaire aimed at describing two dimensions of chronotype: subjective phase, i.e. morning–evening preference (M–E scale, 8 items) and subjective amplitude, i.e. distinctness of the diurnal rhythm of activation (DI scale, 6 items). The study comprised 1374 subjects (13–91 years old, 769 women, 605 men). There was no gender difference in morning–evening orientation, but women scored significantly higher on the distinctness scale (p The Chronotype Questionnaire is a tool of satisfactory accuracy. It shows good enough internal reliability – significant item-total correlations in both scales and acceptable Cronbach’s alpha for M–E scale (0.66–0.84, depending on age group). DI scale showed to be weaker (Cronbach’s alpha 0.51–0.72). The questionnaire seems to be less reliable in young people at their adolescence than in older subjects. High reproducibility of the results in a two-week test–retest (p
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7af572e802da65ae9affdb3e05b4a8935e7490f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Is the shift in chronotype associated with an alteration in well-being? (2015, background): “Among individual characteristics of circadian functioning (Putilov et al. 2010; Ogińska 2011), chronotype, also named morningness–eveningness, gained most attention of researchers.”