Evaluating Theory of Mind in Question Answering

By Aida Nematzadeh, Kaylee Burns, Erin Grant, Alison Gopnik, T. Griffiths. 2018

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We propose a new dataset for evaluating question answering models with respect to their capacity to reason about beliefs. Our tasks are inspired by theory-of-mind experiments that examine whether children are able to reason about the beliefs of others, in particular when those beliefs differ from reality. We evaluate a number of recent neural models with memory augmentation. We find that all fail on our tasks, which require keeping track of inconsistent states of the world; moreover, the models’ accuracy decreases notably when random sentences are introduced to the tasks at test.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Natural Language Processing, Question Answering & Reading Comprehension

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Yejin Choi
  4. Graham Neubig
  5. Jianfeng Gao
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Noah A. Smith
  8. Caiming Xiong

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Trevor Darrell
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Cordelia Schmid
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  8. Graham Neubig

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Graham Neubig
  3. Yejin Choi
  4. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  5. Mirella Lapata
  6. Richard Socher
  7. Percy Liang
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Question Answering & Reading Comprehension

  1. Mirella Lapata
  2. Graham Neubig
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer

Citations in the corpus