Evaluating Theory of Mind in Question Answering
By Aida Nematzadeh, Kaylee Burns, Erin Grant, Alison Gopnik, T. Griffiths. 2018
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We propose a new dataset for evaluating question answering models with respect to their capacity to reason about beliefs. Our tasks are inspired by theory-of-mind experiments that examine whether children are able to reason about the beliefs of others, in particular when those beliefs differ from reality. We evaluate a number of recent neural models with memory augmentation. We find that all fail on our tasks, which require keeping track of inconsistent states of the world; moreover, the models’ accuracy decreases notably when random sentences are introduced to the tasks at test.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Natural Language Processing, Question Answering & Reading Comprehension
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Mohit Bansal
- Yejin Choi
- Graham Neubig
- Jianfeng Gao
- Percy Liang
- Noah A. Smith
- Caiming Xiong
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Mohit Bansal
- Luc Van Gool
- Trevor Darrell
- Dacheng Tao
- Cordelia Schmid
- Xiaogang Wang
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Graham Neubig
In Natural Language Processing
- Mohit Bansal
- Graham Neubig
- Yejin Choi
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Mirella Lapata
- Richard Socher
- Percy Liang
- Jianfeng Gao
In Question Answering & Reading Comprehension
Citations in the corpus
- Experience Grounds Language (2020, background): “The ability to consider the feelings and knowledge of others is now commonly referred to as the “Theory of Mind” (Nematzadeh et al., 2018).”
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs (2023, background): “Theory of Mind Guanaco displays surprisingly strong Theory of Mind capabilities [41, 52].”
- Theory of Mind and Preference Learning at the Interface of Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and AI: A Review (2022, methodology): “Inspired by false-belief ToM evaluation protocols in cognitive science, Nematzadeh et al. (2018) and Le et al. (2019) have proposed first-order and second-order belief evaluation tasks for language models (also see Section Dysfunction of Theory of Mind for discussion about the interaction of ToM and…”
- Revisiting the Evaluation of Theory of Mind through Question Answering (2019, background): “Perner and Wimmer (1985) proposed a set of experiments to test such second-order beliefs in children.”
- ALERT: Adapt Language Models to Reasoning Tasks (2022, background): “, 2020) tomqa find location easy clean (Nematzadeh et al., 2018)”
- Few-shot Language Coordination by Modeling Theory of Mind (2021, background): “Rabinowitz et al. (2018) are the first to present a successful modeling of the mental state of various species of agent.”