Natural Logic and Semantics

By Larry Moss. 2009

25 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Two of the main motivations for logic and (model-theoretic) semantics overlap in the sense that both subjects are concerned with representing features of natural language meaning and inference. At the same time, the two subjects have other motivations and so are largely separate enterprises. This paper returns to the topic of language and logic, presenting to semanticists natural logic, the study of logics for reasoning with sentences close to their surface form. My goal is to show that the subject already has some results that natural language semanticists should find interesting. At the same time it leads to problems and perspectives that I hope will interest the community. One leading idea is that the target logics for translations should have a decidable validity problem, ruling out full first-order logic. I also will present a fairly new result based on the transitivity of comparative adjective phrases that suggests that in addition to ‘meaning postulates’ in semantics, we will also need to posit ‘proof principles’.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Natural Language Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Kyle Richardson
  2. Peter Clark
  3. Oyvind Tafjord
  4. Ashish Sabharwal
  5. Lasha Abzianidze
  6. Tushar Khot
  7. Mohit Bansal
  8. Hannaneh Hajishirzi

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Lasha Abzianidze
  2. Oyvind Tafjord
  3. Kyle Richardson
  4. Peter Clark

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Kyle Richardson
  2. Peter Clark
  3. Oyvind Tafjord
  4. Ashish Sabharwal
  5. Lasha Abzianidze
  6. Tushar Khot
  7. Mohit Bansal
  8. Jonathan Berant

Citations in the corpus