Income inequality, education expenditures, and growth

By Kevin Sylwester. 2000

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c784d7e1ba0687212c79e3610bc6fd0b95134a29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Governance, entrepreneurship and economic growth (2012, background): “In the case of education, Sylwester (2000) shows that a higher income inequality is associated with a higher public consumption in education that in the short term has a negative effect on economic growth and a positive effect in the long term.”
Can education expenditures reduce income inequality (2002, background): “Studies such as Easterly and Rebelo (1993) and Sylwester (1999) report that education expenditures are either not associated with economic growth or perhaps even lower growth in the short run.”
The Impact of Higher Education on Economic Growth in ASEAN-5 Countries (2021, background): “This evidence has also been found in the work of Sylweste [33] which revealed that education spending harms economic growth in the short term, but it plays a positive role in the long run.”
Income inequality‐economic growth and non‐linearity: a case of Pakistan (2010, background): “It is even possible that inequality limits growth at the national scale while it is associated with an increase in economic incentives at the regional/local level, where most of the factors (labor) are exceedingly mobile ( Sylwester, 2000”
Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization? (2008, unknown): “…contributions from the empirical side include Alesina and Perotti (1996), Perotti (1996), Barro (2000), Forbes (2000), Piketty (2003), Piketty and Saez (2003), Roine and Waldenström (2008), and Sylwester (2000). segments of the population have increased across all regions and income groups.”
Inequality and Growth: Uncovering the Main Conclusions from the Empirics (2014, unknown): “Persson and Tabellini (1994), Perotti (1996) and Sylwester (2000) find evidence supporting the political mechanism but not the economic mechanism.”
Inequality and Growth in the United States: Evidence from a New State-Level Panel of Income Inequality Measures (2009, background): “Our analysis does not, for example, consider the impact of structural breaks in the state-level time series, nor does it consider potential nonlinearities in the relationship between inequality and growth, a point of emphasis in parts of the recent theoretical literature (see, e.g., Banerjee and Duf”
Foreign trade regimes and the FDI–Growth Nexus: a case study of Thailand (2003, methodology): “This proxy variable has been used in several empirical studies [e.g., McMahon, 1998; Sylwester, 2000].”