The sensitivity of linear regression coefficients' confidence limits to the omission of a confounder

By Carrie A. Hosman, Ben B. Hansen, Paul Holland. 2009

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Omitted variable bias can affect treatment effect estimates obtained from observational data due to the lack of random assignment to treatment groups. Sensitivity analyses adjust these estimates to quantify the impact of potential omitted variables. This paper presents methods of sensitivity analysis to adjust interval estimates of treatment effect---both the point estimate and standard error---obtained using multiple linear regression. Central to our approach is what we term benchmarking, the use of data to establish reference points for speculation about omitted confounders. The method adapts to treatment effects that may differ by subgroup, to scenarios involving omission of multiple variables, and to combinations of covariance adjustment with propensity score stratification. We illustrate it using data from an influential study of health outcomes of patients admitted to critical care.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c767a22cd87a0d5da8cd4227777e7d922278d8d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Bernard S. Black
  2. V. Atanasov
  3. Paul R. Rosenbaum
  4. Dylan S. Small

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Dylan S. Small
  2. J. Hsu
  3. Paul R. Rosenbaum
  4. Bernard S. Black
  5. V. Atanasov
  6. José R. Zubizarreta
  7. Qingyuan Zhao
  8. Peng Ding

Citations in the corpus