Interception of photosynthetically active radiation and radiation-use efficiency of wheat, field pea and mustard in a semi-arid environment

By M. O'Connell, Garry O'Leary, D. Whitfield, D. Connor. 2004

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Resource use efficiency of field-grown sunflower, sorghum, wheat and chickpea: II. Water use efficiency and comparison with radiation use efficiency (2005, background): “…e often loses its linearity under water stress (Azam-Ali et al., 1984) and nutrient deficit conditions (Muchow and Davis, 1988; Hall et al., 1995, O’Connell et al., 2004), whereas w appears to be more conservative, at least under less than severe water stresses (Hsiao, 1993; Steduto et al.,…”
FOLIAR APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM UNDER WATER DEFICIT CONDITIONS IMPROVED THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT ( TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) (2012, background): “Drought reduced photosynthesis and ultimately resulted in reduced 1000- grain weight, grain yield, number of grains per spike and other yield contributing components (Foulkes et al., 2001; O’Connell et al., 2004; Brisson and Casals, 2005).”
Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton (2008, methodology): “This value is close to the value of 2.6–3.1 g DM MJ (PAR) 1 reported by Kiniry et al. (1989) and within the range from 1.8 to 4.2 g DM MJ (PAR) 1 reported by Olesen et al. (2002) and O’Connell et al. (2004).”