Science and public policy: what's proof got to do with it?
By Naomi Oreskes. 2004
275 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c749b8c2990131897671bce75e3f7297d9c20af0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Roger A. Pielke Sr.
- Marcela Brugnach
- Kristjan Jespersen
- Stuart N. Lane
- M. Chapman
- R. Naidoo
- G. Wilson
- G. Singh
In Sociology and Political Science
- Roger A. Pielke Sr.
- Stuart N. Lane
- Christopher P. Barrington-Leigh
- R. Naidoo
- G. Wilson
- I. Bailey
- Karen J. Esler
- B. Muraca
Citations in the corpus
- Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science - policy interface (2013, background): “…cannot be described in terms of clear boundaries between science and politics: the zones of engagement are fluid and vague the traffic between the institutional domains of politics and science is rather dense (Demeritt, 2001; Oreskes, 2004; Lövbrand, 2007; Huitema and Turnhout, 2009; Beck, 2011).”
- Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world (2013, background): “First, it is well-established that science advances through a process of examination, revision and reexamination (Oreskes, 2004), a process in which scientific progress is most rapid when existing knowledge claims are no longer found to hold.”
- How science makes environmental controversies worse (2004, background): “Oceanographers chose to interpret the uncertainty associated with the National Research Council study as an endorsement of the safety of ATOC.”
- Theorising Transitional Pathways in Response to Climate Change: Technocentrism, Ecocentrism, and the Carbon Economy (2009, background): “…term by according greater status to the `knowable' (known technologies being implemented somewhere at an industrial scale) and the measurable (Oreskes, 2004), but leaves alternative possibilities, especially those entailing energy (as opposed to carbon) frugal behaviour, relocalisation, or…”
- Maturing the New Water Management Paradigm: Progressing from Aspiration to Practice (2011, background): “Despite the acknowledgement of the existence of uncertainty and of the illusion of complete knowledge in environmental decision-making (see e.g. Bradshaw and Borchers 2000; Bergkamp et al. 2003; Oreskes 2004; Wardekker et al. 2008), the participants in the researched case studies pursue the ideal of”
- Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability (2017, background): “Efficiency may also impede equity when program designs unintentionally exacerbate barriers to participation for poorer landowners, including land tenure and requirements to hire foresters to complete applications (Pagiola, 2008; Anderson & Zerriffi, 2012).”
- When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist (2004, background): “Oreskes, 2004; Sarewitz, 2004in this volume).”
- Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability (2020, background): “Clearly, policy action to address emerging threats is not a straightforward function of the quality of the evidence (Michaels, 2008; Oreskes, 2004).”