An Examination of Digital Forensic Models

By Mark Reith, Clinton G. Carr, G. Gunsch. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 2002

536 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c73f47d8385f452dfd25bbaab754874b65594ccd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. N. Beebe
2. J. Clark
3. Eugene H. Spafford
4. Brian D. Carrier

Citations in the corpus

• A hierarchical, objectives-based framework for the digital investigations process (2005, methodology): “Information that should be documented includes, but is not limited to the following (Palmer 2001; DoJ 2001; Reith et al. 2002; Carrier and Spafford 2003; Mandia et al. 2003; Nelson et al. 2004):”
• Getting Physical with the Digital Investigation Process (2003, background): “Air Force identified the common traits that various process models had and incorporated them into an abstract process model [ 23 ].”