Macrophyte trophic indicator values from a European perspective
By S. Schneider. 2007
83 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c73495cb788ff825df2ca95ca8cc9d03b505a15f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Erik Jeppesen
- M. Søndergaard
- T. Lauridsen
- E. Lindstrøm
- S. Schneider
- S. Puijalon
- G. Bornette
- J. P. Jensen
In Environmental Chemistry
- Erik Jeppesen
- M. Søndergaard
- T. Lauridsen
- S. Puijalon
- E. Lindstrøm
- S. Schneider
- G. Bornette
- J. P. Jensen
Citations in the corpus
- Submerged macrophytes as indicators of the ecological quality of lakes (2010, background): “Methods to characterise lake macrophyte communities have traditionally focused on the presence of ‘indicator’ species often based on expert judgement (Duigan, Kovach & Palmer, 2007; Schneider, 2007).”
- The periphyton index of trophic status PIT: a new eutrophication metric based on non-diatomaceous benthic algae in Nordic rivers (2011, methodology): “Botanical indices using nutrient-based indicator values, like, e.g., the Trophic Index of Macrophytes (Schneider & Melzer, 2003) and other macrophyte indices (see Schneider, 2007 ) or the Trophic Diatom Index (Kelly et al., 2008), indicate eutrophic conditions in a shaded river having high nutrient”
- Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review (2011, background): “probably due to the greater role of ammonium ions in less oxygenated stagnant water bodies, most species profiles are consistent between the different indices (Schneider 2007).”