A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia
By Thomas A. Adler, Luca de Alfaro. The Web Conference, 2007
498 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c71e5ec52ed7c639e2ba8467b8bcfe922c195abb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Daniel S. Weld
- Dan Roth
- Percy Liang
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Tom Michael Mitchell
- Jure Leskovec
- Mohit Bansal
- Fei Wu
In Communication
- Loreen Terveen
- Srijan Kumar
- Daniel S. Weld
- Dan Roth
- Jeff Pasternack
- Fei Wu
- Katherine A. Panciera
- Ndapandula Nakashole
In Information Systems
- Loreen Terveen
- John Riedl
- Srijan Kumar
- Shyong K. Lam
- Ndapandula Nakashole
- Tom Michael Mitchell
- Jure Leskovec
- Katherine A. Panciera
Citations in the corpus
- Knowing What to Believe (when you already know something) (2010, background): “For example, (Zeng et al., 2006) and Wik-itrust (Adler and de Alfaro, 2007) determine trust in a wiki’s text passages from sequences of revisions but lack the claim-level granularity and general applicability of fact-finders.”
- A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems (2009, background): “More recently, reputation systems have been proposed as a means to filter out inauthentic content (pollution) for file-sharing applications [8], a method for selecting usable network resources [9], a means to identify high-quality contributions to Wikipedia [10], and a way to punish [11] or prevent ”
- Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information (2012, background): “Adler and de Alfaro (2007) proposed a reputation system for Wikipedia as a way to evaluate authors' reliability according to the lifespan of their edits.”
- Size matters: word count as a measure of quality on wikipedia (2008, background): “Adler and de Alfaro [1] devised similar metrics to quantify the reputation of authors and editors.”
- Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia (2009, methodology): “Adler and Alfaro developed a reputation metric for editors which measured how long an editor’s changes last over time[1].”
- Adversarial Web Search (2011, background): “Adler and de Alfaro [6] and Hu et al.”
- Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia (2007, background): “Adler and Alfaro [ 1 ] developed a reputation system for”
- Automatically refining the wikipedia infobox ontology (2008, background): “Adler and Alfaro proposed a reputation system for Wikipedia which checks whether users’ edits are pres erved by subsequent authors [4].”
- Using natural language generation to bootstrap missing Wikipedia articles: A human-centric perspective (2022, background): “Adler and de Alfaro [2] introduce the concept of Edit Distance in the context of vandalism detection on Wikipedia.”
- Language-Aware Truth Assessment of Fact Candidates (2014, methodology): “WikiTrust (Adler and Alfaro, 2007) is a content-aware but domain-specific method.”
- Disinformation on the Web: Impact, Characteristics, and Detection of Wikipedia Hoaxes (2016, background): “Common to all these approaches is that editor reputation has good predictive value of article quality: edits performed by low-reputation authors have a larger probability of being of poor quality [2].”
- Some Like it Hoax: Automated Fake News Detection in Social Networks (2017, background): “Adler and de Alfaro [14] developed a content-driven user reputation system for Wikipedia, allowing to predict the quality of new contributions.”