Regional industrial growth: evidence from Chinese industries

By T. Gao. 2004

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7019bd39df198646ce4dbb2f45e6621285c382e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation in Chinese Regions: The Role of Regional Industrial Specialization and Diversity (2016, background): “To the authors’ knowledge, the only attempt made by GAO (2004) studies the early economic reform period in China from 1985 to 1993 and finds that industrial structure, in terms of specialization and diversity, has no significant impact on the growth of provincial industrial output.”
Trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth in Asian economies (2009, background): “Second, we regard FDI, including cross-border MA Gao, 2004 ).”
Economic Growth, Local Industrial Development and Inter-Regional Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from China (2012, background): “First, at the beginning of its founding in 1949, China feared potential foreign military attacks and, hence, allocated heavy industries in remote inland regions (Gao [15]).”
Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate (2009, methodology): “For example, province-industry output growth in China studied by Gao (2004) yield mixed results depending on the number of variables included in the analysis.”
Internal Geography, International Trade, and Regional Specialization (2016, unknown): “A likely explanation for this pattern lies in Chinese regional planning strategy in the pre-reform era, which located heavy industries in interior provinces for national security purposes (see Gao 2004).”