Optimal path for controlling CO2 emissions in China: A perspective of efficiency analysis

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Marginal CO2 abatement costs: Findings from alternative shadow price estimates for Shanghai industrial sectors (2015, methodology): “…of application, which can be applied to the cases of firms, sectors or even regions (Boyd et al., 1996; Coggins and Swinton, 1996; Lee et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2014b).1 In methodology, the distance function approach may be regarded as an analytical framework consisting of a family of models.”
Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: A DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings (2016, methodology): “Since such calculation is highly relying on the input and output data as capital, labor, intermediate resources and energy consumption, as well as depending on the parametric or non-parametric approaches utilized (Carlson et al., 2000; Zhou et al., 2014; Wang and Wei, 2014), the avoiding of this cal”
Energy savings potential in China's industrial sector: From the perspectives of factor price distortion and allocative inefficiency (2015, background): “From a perspective of efficiency analysis, Zhou et al. (2014b) examined the optimal control of CO2 emissions.”