On the limitations of graph‐theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation

By Atte Moilanen. 2011

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6f229c5b2529a58a808bd4bcb10672f5d3962dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Marie-Josée Fortin
2. Ö. Bodin
3. Santiago Saura
4. C. Turlure
5. V. Stevens
6. S. Blanchet
7. M. Baguette
8. Delphine Legrand

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Ö. Bodin
2. Marie-Josée Fortin
3. Santiago Saura
4. M. Baguette
5. N. Schtickzelle

Citations in the corpus

• Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks (2013, background): “This problem was also identified as a limitation to the use of graph-theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation (Moilanen, 2011).”
• EDITOR'S CHOICE: Stepping stones are crucial for species' long‐distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks (2014, methodology): “Estrada & Bodin 2008, Bodin & Saura 2010), but often more detailed and ecologically realistic estimates of the dispersal likelihood are desired and advocated (Moilanen &Nieminen 2002; Saura & Pascual-Hortal 2007; Moilanen 2011; Awade, Boscolo & Metzger 2012).”