Data Mining Algorithms to Classify Students
By Cristóbal Romero, Sebastián Ventura, Pedro G. Espejo, C. Hervás‐Martínez. Educational Data Mining, 2008
438 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6e29d4a3d70cd09c1397e736a38afd25def7bd3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Z. Papamitsiou
- Anastasios A. Economides
- Wolfgang Greller
- Hendrik Drachsler
- Mykola Pechenizkiy
- Gerben Dekker
- Jan Vleeshouwers
- Katerina Mangaroska
Citations in the corpus
- Predicting Students Drop Out: A Case Study (2009, background): “[2], [4], [8], [11]) which approach should be favored or even to measure whether learnt models outperform more traditional ways of predicting academic success.”
- Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art (2010, background): “Other comparisons of different DM algorithms are made to classify students (predict final marks) based on Moodle usage data [224]; to predict student’s performance (final grade) based”
- Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis (2019, unknown): “…computer-supported predictive analytics (CSPA), computer-supported behavioral analytics (CSBA), and computer-supported visualization analytics (CSVA): that are widely used in previous works (Baker, 2010; Perera et al., 2009; Romero and Ventura, 2007; Romero and Ventura, 2010; Romero et al., 2008).”
- Translating Learning into Numbers: A Generic Framework for Learning Analytics (2012, background): “LA takes advantage of so-called information retrieval technologies like educational data mining (EDM; cf. Romero et al., 2008 ), machine learning, or classical statistical analysis techniques (cf. Figure 1), but other techniques may also be considered relevant, e.g., social network analysis (cf.…”
- Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining in Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence (2014, background): “…is the main determinant of performance (i.e., the final grade), while others, such as number of posts, frequencies of the events and timespent could identify activities that are related to higher or lower marks (Romero et al., 2008; Romero-Zaldivar et al., 2012; Shih, Koedinger & Scheines, 2008).”