Valenced news frames and public support for the EU: Linking content analyses and experimental data

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique (2004, methodology): “A similar argument was provided by De Vreese and Boomgarden (2003).”
Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects (2012, background): “The importance of studying valence frames can be connected to the capacity of such frames to affect opinion and support for an issue (de Vreese and Boomgaarden, 2003), with neutral frames being more relevant only for issue interpretations (see also Bizer and Petty, 2005).”
The Mediating Role of Emotions (2015, unknown): “Yet, research has shown that almost all types of frames could potentially be positive or negative (de Vreese & Boomgaarden, 2003), which suggests that there are other, more content-related, aspects of a news frame that might also influence the extent to which specific emotions are affected.”
What’s in a post? How sentiment and issue salience affect users’ emotional reactions on Facebook (2020, background): “Sentiment, also related to the concept of valence framing (De Vreese & Boomgaarden, 2003), indicates that messages highlight positive or negative aspects, consequentially affecting the salience of these aspects in the audience’s mind (see also Eberl, Boomgaarden, & Wagner, 2017a).”