Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions.
By Florian Pappenberger, Patrick Matgen, Keith Beven, Jean-Baptiste Henry, Laurent Pfister, Paul de Fraipont. 2006
393 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6c45356fad0666b0b127e6d0318318c97fea8d2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Khabat Khosravi
- Ataollah Shirzadi
- Binh Thai Pham
- Himan Shahabi
- D. Tien Bui
- Kamran Chapi
- Vijay P. Singh
- O. Larsen
In Water Science and Technology
- Vijay P. Singh
- Hilary K. McMillan
- Himan Shahabi
- O. Larsen
- Christopher J. A. Macleod
- G. Bilotta
- X. Qin
- J. J. Yu
Citations in the corpus
- Joint Monte Carlo and possibilistic simulation for flood damage assessment (2013, background): “…Singapore The uncertainties associated with the flood inundation modeling exist in data inputs (e.g. rainfall) (He et al. 2009), hydraulics parameters (e.g. Manning’s n) (Straatsma and Huthoff 2010) and model structures (e.g. representation of hydraulic structures) (Pappenberger et al. 2006).”
- Ensemble evaluation of hydrological model hypotheses (2010, methodology): “[47] Stage‐discharge uncertainty was estimated using the following algorithm, adapted from the idea of a fuzzy rating curve [Pappenberger et al., 2006]: [48] 1.”
- A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment (2017, background): “Flooding is a complex phenomenon and hence prediction of flood occurrence is difficult (Pappenberger et al., 2006).”
- Uncertainty in streamflow rating curves: methods, controls and consequences (2014, methodology): “Other methods have been developed using Bayesian frameworks (e.g. Petersen-Overleir et al., 2009) and fuzzy regression (e.g. Bardossy et al., 1990; Pappenberger et al., 2006; Shrestha et al., 2007;Westerberg et al., 2011).”
- Rating curve estimation under epistemic uncertainty (2015, background): “Other authors modified the individual data point likelihoods by limiting the acceptable distance between the data point and the rating curve and/or exchanging the normal distribution for a uniform or pyramidal distribution, drawing on fuzzy set concepts (Pappenberger et al., 2006; Krueger et al., 20”