Influence of Board Size and Independence on Firm Performance: A Study of Indian Companies
By Ajay K. Garg. 2007
196 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6bfbd2e03e229e7c02481f737b4f98645a4b48f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Anjala Kalsie
- S. M. Shrivastav
- Fitriya Fauzi
- Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari
- A. Al‐Swidi
- F. Fadzil
- S. Locke
Citations in the corpus
- Analysis of Board Size and Firm Performance: Evidence from NSE Companies Using Panel Data Approach (2016, methodology): “Thus, based on the research findings, the study recommends that companies in India should not limit the number of directors to six as advocated by Garg (2007) who suggested the board size of six or less and Jensen (1993) who recommended the board size to be anything between six and eight.”
- Board Structure, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: A Study of New Zealand Listed-Firms (2012, background): “Several studies have examined the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on firm performance across countries operating under different characteristics (Callen et al., 2003; Erhardt et al., 2003; Garg, 2007; Kang et al., 2007; Rose, 2007; Sheridan & Milgate, 2005).”
- The Measurements of Firm Performance's Dimensions (2014, background): “Return on Sales Geletkanycz and Boyd (2011), Ghahroudi (2011), Bøhren and Strøm (2010), Muravyev, Talavera, Bilyk and Grechaniuk (2010), By it determined by”