Compatible taper function for Scots pine plantations in northwestern Spain

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, background): “Compatible taper equations provide an alternative approach because their volume integrations are constrained to match a volume equation (Bailey, 1994; Fang et al., 2000), while providing accurate predictions of stem form (Di eguez-Aranda et al., 2006).”
Estimating and predicting bark thickness for seven conifer species in the Acadian Region of North America using a mixed-effects modeling approach: comparison of model forms and subsampling strategies (2011, methodology): “The CAR1 error structure allows the model to be applied to irregularly spaced, unbalanced data (Gregoire et al. 1995; Diéguez-Aranda et al. 2006).”
Modelling annual individual-tree growth and mortality of Scots pine with data obtained at irregular measurement intervals and containing missing observations. (2010, methodology): “To complete the outputs of the model, volume can be easily obtained from the existing taper equations for the species in the study area (Diéguez-Aranda et al., 2006b; Crecente-Campo et al., 2009d).”
Stem taper functions for Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmulleriana in Turkey (2008, background): “However, the disadvantage of variable-form functions is that they cannot be integrated analytically to calculate total stem or log volumes (Diéguez-Aranda et al., 2006).”