Representing Rape: Language and sexual consent

By Susan L. Ehrlich. 2001

266 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6a05007071f710802c6c9a8f08d7408e9db9356

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Telling it Like it isn’t: Obscuring Perpetrator Responsibility for Violent Crime (2004, background): “The same judges selectively characterized perpetrators’ actions as deliberate when the actions had been reformulated (Davis, 1986) as non-violent (e.g. ‘having sex’; see Coates, 1996a, 1997; Ehrlich, 2001).”
Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction (2009, background): “This has been displayed in a particularly vivid fashion in trials of rape (e.g. Ehrlich, 2001; Mateosian, 1993, 2001) or when issues of race or ethnicity intersect a defendant’s charge (e.g. Goodwin and Goodwin, 1997; Schuetz, 1999).”
Reacting to rape: Exploring mock jurors' assessments of complainant credibility. (2008, background): “…suspicious ( Adler 1987 ; Bronitt 1998 ; Brereton 1997 ; Raitt 2004 ), as is a complainant’s lack of physical resistance or injury during an attack ( Ehrlich 2001 ; Lees 1996 ; Temkin and Krahe 2008 ); and it has been suggested that complainants who appear calm, either immediately post-assault or…”
Of ‘Normal Sex’ and ‘Real Rape’: Exploring The Use of Socio-Sexual Scripts in (Mock) Jury Deliberation (2009, background): “Noting that she ‘said no once but then he carried on and she didn’t appear to say no again’, several jurors in this study aligned themselves with counterparts in other recent research (Taylor and Mouzos, 2006) by accepting dubious claims that women routinely engage in ‘token resistance’ (Muehlenhard”