Hypothesis test for normal mixture models: The EM approach

By Jiahua Chen, Pengfei Li. 2009

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Normal mixture distributions are arguably the most important mixture models, and also the most technically challenging. The likelihood function of the normal mixture model is unbounded based on a set of random samples, unless an artificial bound is placed on its component variance parameter. Moreover, the model is not strongly identifiable so it is hard to differentiate between over dispersion caused by the presence of a mixture and that caused by a large variance, and it has infinite Fisher information with respect to mixing proportions. There has been extensive research on finite normal mixture models, but much of it addresses merely consistency of the point estimation or useful practical procedures, and many results require undesirable restrictions on the parameter space. We show that an EM-test for homogeneity is effective at overcoming many challenges in the context of finite normal mixtures. We find that the limiting distribution of the EM-test is a simple function of the $0.5\chi^2_0+0.5\chi^2_1$ and $\chi^2_1$ distributions when the mixing variances are equal but unknown and the $\chi^2_2$ when variances are unequal and unknown. Simulations show that the limiting distributions approximate the finite sample distribution satisfactorily. Two genetic examples are used to illustrate the application of the EM-test.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6903d2703142a82228fcc8baad0e02c5e7da646

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Michael I. Jordan
  2. Hiroyuki Kasahara
  3. Katsumi Shimotsu
  4. Martin J. Wainwright
  5. Bin Yu
  6. Pengfei Li
  7. David M. Blei
  8. Yuejiao Fu

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Martin J. Wainwright
  2. Michael I. Jordan
  3. Hiroyuki Kasahara
  4. Katsumi Shimotsu
  5. Bin Yu
  6. Pengfei Li
  7. Francis R. Bach
  8. Kengo Kato

Citations in the corpus