Improving Pronoun Translation for Statistical Machine Translation
By Liane Guillou. 2012
75 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing, Machine Translation
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Yonatan Belinkov
- Hal Daumé Iii
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Matteo Negri
- Marco Turchi
- Graham Neubig
- Yang Trista Cao
- Mohit Bansal
In Machine Translation
- Matteo Negri
- Marco Turchi
- Jörg Tiedemann
- Karin Sim Smith
- Hal Daumé Iii
- Yang Trista Cao
- Mauro Cettolo
- Andrei Popescu-Belis
Citations in the corpus
- Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution (2019, background): “In machine translation, producing correct gendered forms in gender languages often requires coreference to have been solved [Guillou 2012; Hardmeier and Federico 2010; Hardmeier and Guillou 2018; Mitkov 1999].”
- On Integrating Discourse in Machine Translation (2017, background): “, 2014), pronoun prediction (Guillou, 2012; Hardmeier et al., 2013b; Guillou, 2016) and negation (Fancellu and Webber, 2014;”
- WikiCREM: A Large Unsupervised Corpus for Coreference Resolution (2019, background): “This task is of crucial importance in various other NLP tasks, such as information extraction (Nakayama, 2019) and machine translation (Guillou, 2012).”
- Findings of the 2017 DiscoMT Shared Task on Cross-lingual Pronoun Prediction (2017, background): “Pronoun translation is known to be challenging not only for MT in general, but also for Statistical Machine Translation (SMT) in particular (Le Nagard and Koehn, 2010; Hardmeier and Federico, 2010; Novák, 2011; Guillou, 2012; Hardmeier, 2014).”
- Using Coreference Links to Improve Spanish-to-English Machine Translation (2017, background): “Despite the numerous coreference and anaphora resolution systems designed in the past decades (Mitkov, 2002; Ng, 2010), the interest in using them to improve pronoun translation has only recently emerged (Le Nagard and Koehn, 2010; Hardmeier and Federico, 2010; Guillou, 2012).”
- Findings of the 2016 WMT Shared Task on Cross-lingual Pronoun Prediction (2019, background): “Pronoun translation poses a problem for current state-of-the-art Statistical Machine Translation (SMT) systems (Le Nagard and Koehn, 2010; Hardmeier and Federico, 2010; Nov´ak, 2011; Guillou, 2012; Hardmeier, 2014).”
- Gender Bias in Machine Translation (2021, background): “In MT, we record prior studies concerned with pronoun translation and coreference resolution across typologically different languages accounting for both animate and inanimate referents (Hardmeier and Federico, 2010; Le Nagard and Koehn, 2010; Guillou, 2012).”
- Neural Machine Translation with Extended Context (2017, background): “…document-wide translation consistency, the proper handling of referential elements such as pronominal anaphora and other discourse-level phenomena (Guillou, 2012; Russo et al., 2012; Voigt and Jurafsky, 2012; Xiong et al., 2013a; Ben et al., 2013; Xiong and Zhang, 2013; Xiong et al., 2013b;…”
- Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution: An Analysis of Gender and Bias Throughout the Machine Learning Lifecycle* (2021, background): “In machine translation, producing correct gendered forms in gender languages often requires coreference to have been solved (Mitkov 1999; Hardmeier and Federico 2010; Guillou 2012; Hardmeier and Guillou 2018).”