Fault-tolerant quantum computation with cluster states

By Morten Nielsen, Christopher M. Dawson. 2004

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The one-way quantum computing model introduced by Raussendorf and Briegel [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001)] shows that it is possible to quantum compute using only a fixed entangled resource known as a cluster state, and adaptive single-qubit measurements. This model is the basis for several practical proposals for quantum computation, including a promising proposal for optical quantum computation based on cluster states [M. A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published), quant-ph/0402005]. A significant open question is whether such proposals are scalable in the presence of physically realistic noise. In this paper we prove two threshold theorems which show that scalable fault-tolerant quantum computation may be achieved in implementations based on cluster states, provided the noise in the implementations is below some constant threshold value. Our first threshold theorem applies to a class of implementations in which entangling gates are applied deterministically, but with a small amount of noise. We expect this threshold to be applicable in a wide variety of physical systems. Our second threshold theorem is specifically adapted to proposals such as the optical cluster-state proposal, in which nondeterministic entangling gates are used. A critical technical component of our proofs is two powerful theorems which relate the properties of noisy unitary operations restricted to act on a subspace of state space to extensions of those operations acting on the entire state space. We expect these theorems to have a variety of applications in other areas of quantum-information science.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c64dbaa06446df904017225a61537f1a3ea16614

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Nicolas C. Menicucci
  2. Joseph Francis Fitzsimons
  3. Daniel Gottesman
  4. Terry Rudolph
  5. Elham Kashefi
  6. Anne Broadbent
  7. John Preskill
  8. Wolfgang Dür

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Nicolas C. Menicucci
  2. Joseph Francis Fitzsimons
  3. Elham Kashefi
  4. Anne Broadbent
  5. Terry Rudolph
  6. Daniel Gottesman
  7. Wolfgang Dür
  8. Harald Weinfurter

Citations in the corpus