Options for Managing Invasive Marine Species

By R. Thresher, A. Kuris. Biological Invasions, 2004

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Early detection of aquatic invaders using metabarcoding reveals a high number of non‐indigenous species in Canadian ports (2016, background): “Once an invasive species becomes established in an aquatic habitat, it can be very challenging to eliminate (Thresher & Kuris, 2004), making accurate and reliable identification of NIS crucial.”
Genetic control of invasive fish: technological options and its role in integrated pest management (2014, methodology): “Support is also likely to vary widely across jurisdictions due to attitudes towards genetic modification in general (Thresher and Kuris 2004; Fisher and Cribb 2005) In the context of the genetic control of invasive pest fish, IPM as originally conceived has three key lessons: (1) Goals…”
Gateways to alien invasions in the European seas (2014, background): “Once alien species become established in the marine environment, it is usually impossible to eradicate them (Thresher and Kuris 2004 – but see Anderson 2005).”
Use of DNA metabarcoding for stomach content analysis in the invasive lionfish Pterois volitans in Puerto Rico (2016, background): “Marine invaders, once established, often become integrated into the ecosys- tem, whereby complete eradication is unfeasible (Thresher & Kuris 2004).”