Disturbance to a foraging seabird by sea-based tourism: Implications for reserve management in marine protected areas

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing the location and stability of foraging hotspots for pelagic seabirds: An approach to identify marine Important Bird Areas (IBAs) in Spain (2012, background): “MPAs placed near the coast, as those proposed here, could also address issues related with pollution (especially point-source events), recreational activities, and industrial development (e.g. windfarms) (Pedersen et al., 2009; Pichegru et al., 2010; Ronconi et al., 2002; Velando and Munilla, 2011).”
Biological effects, conservation potential, and research priorities of shark diving tourism. (2015, background): “…tourism has been demonstrated to negatively impact many types of marine wildlife including cetaceans, sea birds, seals, manatees and stingrays (e.g., Newsome et al., 2004; Semeniuk et al., 2009; Sorice et al., 2006; Steckenreuter et al., 2011; Velando and Munilla, 2011; Andersen et al., 2012).”
Effects of habituation, research and ecotourism on faecal glucocorticoid metabolites in wild western lowland gorillas: Implications for conservation management (2014, background): “However, a growing number of accounts document behavioural and physiological alterations in the species encountered (Tadesse and Kotler, 2012; Treves and Brandon, 2005; Semeniuk et al., 2009; Velando and Munilla, 2011), causing concerns that the costs of tourism to the focal organisms may outweigh t”