The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication

By R. Cocroft, R. L. Rodríguez. 2005

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c62950f31d25fa9adee9c059eb21e686db7d781c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success (2008, background): “…by the complex relationship between size/mass and frequency in seismic communication, which does not necessarily follow the same rules as those for acoustic signals (Cocroft & Rodriguez 2005); that is, even very small animals such as spiders can create very lowfrequency signals via a substrate.”
The Systematics of the Hemiptera (2008, unknown): “Vibrational communication is diverse in Hemiptera, with species producing sound in terrestrial as well as aquatic ecosystems, being substrate communication common (Crocroft and Rodríguez 2005).”
Effects of Wind on Plants (2008, background): “Windinduced motion of plants affects the behavior of borne insects and their communication (Cocroft & Rodriguez 2005).”
Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity (2011, background): “…variety of animal taxa, including mammals, reptiles, amphibians, birds, arthropods and nematodes (Hill 2009), although this modality is most commonly exhibited and studied within arthropods (Rovner 1975; Kalmring & Elsner 1985; Barth 2002b; Vibrant-Doberlet & Cokl 2004; Cocroft & Rodríguez 2005).”
Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers (2008, background): “Species in the E. binotata complex communicate using substrate-borne vibrational signals transmitted through the leaves and stems of their host plant, as do many other plant-feeding insects (Virant-Doberlet and Cokl 2004; Cocroft and Rodrı́guez 2005).”
Variation in Plant Substrates and its Consequences for Insect Vibrational Communication (2006, background): “…species but differ between species, selection for efficient signal transmission (a component of the sensory drive hypothesis; Endler 1992; Henry & Wells 2004; Cocroft & Rodriguez 2005; Cokl et al. 2005) could result in signal divergence between species using different plant species or plant parts.”
Wind-induced noise alters signaler and receiver behavior in vibrational communication (2010, methodology): “The amplitude spectrum of each wind burst was adjusted to compensate for plant-filtering properties using a procedure described in Cocroft and Rodríguez (2005); briefly, the filter imposed by the playback setup and plant stem was calculated then used to generate a digital filter to apply to the…”
Disruption of the reproductive behaviour of Scaphoideus titanus by playback of vibrational signals (2009, background): “Currently there is not enough information available on the transmission of wind-generated noise in different plants (Cocroft & Rodrı́guez, 2005).”