Assessing the Impact of Exposure Time and Incapacitation on Longitudinal Trajectories of Criminal Offending

By Alex R. Piquero, A. Blumstein, Robert W. Brame, Rudy Haapanen, E. Mulvey, Dan Nagin. 2001

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c61e4c8fc6d5060f4ac39e8a22c627e976d171fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Examining the process of offender change: the transition to crime desistance (2009, background): “Still, as many as 70% of offenders follow some approximation of the age crime curve, with only a small percentage of offenders maintaining criminal activity well into adulthood (Piquero et al., 2001).”
Delinquent Development in a Sample of High-Risk Youth (2009, methodology): “…respondent is incarcerated, time spent incarcerated was corrected for by calculating exposure per respondent per year when estimating trajectories (Piquero et al. 2001).2 We also controlled for censoring, caused by shorter observation periods or, in case of five sample members, death during the…”
Methodological Sensitivities to Latent Class Analysis of Long-Term Criminal Trajectories (2004, background): “ Piquero et al. (2001) found that indeed, incarceration time affected the trajectory shapes.”
Taking Stock of Developmental Trajectories of Criminal Activity over the Life Course (2008, background): “Second, there has been some work on the sensitivity of the trajectory methodology to non-random sample attrition, specifically incarceration and mortality (Eggleston et al., 2004; Piquero et al., 2001).”
Institutional Misconduct, Delinquent Background, and Rearrest Frequency Among Serious and Violent Delinquent Offenders (2011, methodology): “…information, previous research suggests that accounting for postrelease incarceration lends greater specificity to questions of continuity versus lulls or desistance in offending behavior postrelease (Lattimore et al., 2004; Piquero et al., 2001; Piquero, Brame, et al., 2002; Sampson & Laub, 2003).”
Extending the Study of Continuity and Change: Gender Differences in the Linkage Between Adolescent and Adult Offending (2005, background): “We examined the extent to which the conviction records were influenced by differential exposure time (see Piquero et al., 2001 ).”