The Euro Effect on Trade is not as Large as Commonly Thought

By M. Bun, Franc J. G. M. Klaassen. 2007

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c61a27cba52d5b36b846c07328cb38bdd1312df4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

The Eurozone and Political Economic Institutions (2016, background): “…and of the wider globalization, the empirical evidence suggests that the euro made a substantial contribution to integration in all these areas (Bun & Klaassen 2002, 2007; Barr et al. 2003; Micco et al. 2003; Baldwin 2006; Blank & Buch 2007; Petroulas 2007; Baldwin et al. 2008; Coeurdacier &…”
The Gravity Model Specification for Modeling International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreement Effects: A 10-Year Review of Empirical Studies (2010, background): “Other researchers have examined trade policy implications and factors that affect trade, such as natural border effects [65], monetary union impacts [66, 67], domino effects [68], the foreign direct investments [69], the rules-of-origin [70], transportation costs [71, 72], neutral partners theory [6”
Trade Spill-Overs of Fiscal Policy in the European Union: A Panel Analysis (2006, unknown): “Further, we include fixed time effects to control for, among other things, the general state of the world economy, and have countrypair specific linear time trends representing potentially omitted trending determinants of exports (such as transportation costs and trade liberalization), as motivated ”
Rose effect and the euro: is the magic gone? (2010, unknown): “Adam and Cobham (2007) No 0.8750 16.010 0.153 Shin and Serlenga (2007) Yes -0.0003 -0.075 1.094 Bun and Klaassen (2007) Yes 0.0320 2.286 0.732 de Sousa and Lochard (2007) Yes 0.1500 3.750 0.018”