Innateness and the Sciences

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Biological Implausibility of the Nature-Nurture Dichotomy & What It Means for the Study of Infancy (2011, background): “…(Blumberg, 2008; Gottlieb, 1976, 1991b, 1992, 1997, 1998; Griffiths & Gray, 1994; Johnston & Edwards, 2002; Keller, 2000; Kuo, 1967; Lehrman, 1953, 1970; Lickliter, 2007; Mameli & Bateson, 2006; Michel & Moore, 1995; Moore, 2003; Oyama, 2000; Schneirla, 1957; Spencer, Blumberg, et al., 2009).”
Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: inherited action patterns and social influences (2006, background): “…it discourages investigation of development without actually explaining it (Lehrman 1953; but see Lorenz 1965; Berridge 1994; Marler 2004), and that it has been variously defined as implying a number of different characteristics that have not been shown to co-occur reliably (Mameli & Bateson 2006).”
The vernacular concept of innateness (2009, methodology): “be both genuinely independent definitions and potentially valuable scientific constructs ( Mameli and Bateson, 2006, p. 177-8 ).”
Innateness, AlphaZero, and Artificial Intelligence (2018, unknown): “According to Mameli and Bateson (2006) the term innateness has been used in over two dozen ways, ranging from 2 “universal” to “biological” to “acquired independently of learning”; it is the latter that I have in mind.”